Chris Howie wrote:
> 
> rotate <0,clock,0>  // move clock into the desired axis

That's the second time I've seen that particular rotate used in this
thread.  Well, the first one was "rotate clock * y".  In neither case was
there a Start_ or End_Clock mentioned.

Am I a complete idiot for using "rotate <0, 360*clock, 0>", or did two
people make the same mistake?  Both of these options?  Neither?

Deaken (who has set followups, since this is not a unix question)

Post a reply to this message